[Raytrace] A real world application
Peter Chen
chen@stars.gsfc.nasa.gov
Fri, 21 Dec 2001 01:19:18 -0500
If anyone is interested, I have a real world problem for which I'd
appreciate community input.
In the current work I'm doing we are producing a dozen or so lightweight
composite mirrors. These are all 20" diameter, f/1.9, spherical
mirrors. (Some of you may have seen the one I showed at Stellafane last
year). I would like to build a couple of simple minded telescopes out of
these mirrors for making portable scopes to observe point sources (= stars).
The primary being spherical, the best that can be done in a two
mirror system is to make a inverse Dall-Kirkham (or Pressman-Carmichael,
Rutten's terminology). The secondary is a convex spheroid. This is a zero
field system. The image is a spot only on the optical axis. I've added a
diagonal flat for finding a target in the field.
The system requirements are as follows:
Primary - 20 in diameter, 76 in. ROC, sphere
Secondary - 4 in diameter (to reduce fabrication cost, actually any size up
to 6 inch is ok)
Diagonal flat - to be located 2 inch in front of primary, for ease of mounting
Focus - 13 in. above optical axis (to accommodate focuser)
Running these numbers through Rutten and van Venrooij's TDesign
program, I got a set of preliminary numbers. I then put them into Zemax
and OSLO to check out the design and try some optimization. So far the
best I can get is something like the following: (OSLO format)
*LENS DATA
20 inch inverse dall-kirkham
SRF RADIUS THICKNESS APERTURE RADIUS GLASS SPE NOTE
OBJ -- 1.0000e+20 1.0000e+17 AIR
1 -- 772.160000 50.000000 X AIR
AST -1.9304e+03 -772.160000 254.000000 AKX REFLECT
3 -- 721.360000 50.800000 REFLECT *
4 -- -- -- AIR *
5 -- -- 22.779000 REFLECT
6 -- -330.200000 -- AIR *
IMS -- -- 6.000000
*CONIC AND POLYNOMIAL ASPHERIC DATA
SRF CC AD AE AF AG
3 8.959129 -- -- -- --
*TILT/DECENTER DATA
4 DT 1 DCX -- DCY -- DCZ --
TLA -45.000000 TLB -- TLC --
6 DT 1 DCX -- DCY -- DCZ --
TLA -45.000000 TLB -- TLC --
The problems are:
1. It doesn't focus to a spot, even on axis. The secondary roc
doesn't seem quite right.
2. I have no idea how difficult it would be to make a spheroid with
a conic constant of 8.959129. Is that realistic? How does one test such a
piece? (note: The piece will be concave. We replicate with it and get
the convex part).
: Does anyone have any suggestions?
Happy Holidays, all.
Regards,
P.C. Chen